A Federal Court judge in Canada has issued an order against the infamous Soap2Day streaming website, deeming it a 'copycat' platform engaging in copyright infringement. The ruling requires the website's operators, John Does 1 to 4, to pay over $22 million in damages and compels internet service providers to block both existing and future Soap2Day sites. This case highlights the ongoing 'whack-a-mole' battle between content providers and piracy platforms. The judge's decision also showcases the evolution of legal strategies against online piracy, moving from 'static' blocking orders to more dynamic approaches that can keep pace with the rapid changes in the streaming landscape.
Whoever — and wherever — John Does 1 through 4 are, the mysterious individuals behind the Soap2Day streaming website owe some of the world's biggest media companies a lot of money. But if it's any consolation, they're breaking new Canadian legal ground. A website purporting to be Soap2Day was online this week despite an order from a Federal Court judge targeting 'copycat' streaming websites from offering free content.
(CBC) Whoever — and wherever — John Does 1 to 4 are, the individuals behind the mysterious Soap2Day streaming websites owe some of the world's biggest content producers a lot of money. A Federal Court judge issued reasons last week for an extraordinary ruling targeting 'copycat' websites of the popular but elusive Soap2Day service in what he called a 'whack-a-mole' battle by companies like Netflix, Bell Media and Disney to protect their products from internet piracy. Judge Simon Fothergill also ordered John Does 1 to 4 to pay more than $22 million to the content producers, owners and distributors who obtained the order, forcing internet service providers to block both existing Soap2Day websites and any copycats identified in the future. 'The plaintiffs report a growing trend, whereby infringing platforms that are successfully deactivated are promptly replaced by copycat sites,' Fothergill wrote. 'Platforms such as 123movies, Popcorn Time and Pirate Bay have all been shut down or blocked at one time or another, only to be replaced by identical sites with similar names.' Fothergill's ruling traces the six-year evolution of attempts to use the courts to crack down on piracy — starting with a groundbreaking 2019 ruling that saw a judge issue Canada's first nationwide blocking order. In that case — which was appealed all the way up to the Supreme Court of Canada — Bell Media, Group TVA Inc. and Rogers went after GoldTV, an online service offering subscribers thousands of traditional TV channels for as little as $15 a month. Federal Court judges have issued a series of orders since 2019 targeting the proliferation of popular streaming services which provide free content in violation of copyright. Fothergill called the order in the GoldTV case 'static' — involving specific domain names and IP addresses — because the scofflaw's subscription model made 'it comparatively easy to verify whether subsequent domains and IP addresses were associated with the original platform.' 'By contrast, the Soap2Day platforms do not use a subscription-based model but rather derive revenue primarily from advertisements,' the judge wrote. 'It is therefore difficult to determine whether new domains operating under the banner of Soap2day are operated by the same people or are otherwise related.' In the years since, the internet pirates have become more savvy, and the content providers have sought to fight them with increasingly more flexible injunctions from the court. In 2022, another Federal Court judge issued what he called a 'dynamic' site-blocking order to stop the unauthorized broadcast of live National Hockey League games. According to that decision, NHL broadcasters claimed the 'static' order against GoldTV wouldn't work for them 'because the pirates have adopted new measures to avoid detection and defeat site blocking, including moving their infringing content from site to site on a regular basis.' Vancouver Canucks' Conor Garland celebrates his goal against the Edmonton Oilers during Game 1 of an NHL hockey Stanley Cup playoff series in 2024. Broadcasters have obtained sweeping orders to block illicit streaming of the games. (Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press) 'Court approval would be impossible prior to each new blocking step because these efforts need to happen in real-time in order to be effective,' the judge wrote. 'Most fans watch hockey games live rather than recording them to watch later. This combination of factors means that blocking of unlawful streaming of live NHL broadcasts must happen while the broadcast is underway.' The 2022 decision — which was another first of its kind — provided insight into the popularity of free streaming services. Over a one-month period in 2021, Rogers claimed an average of 20,000 of their internet subscribers accessed 'known illegal IPTV services on a daily basis.' 'During one evening when a playoff game between Montreal and Toronto was broadcast (a highly popular event) at least 25,000 Bell Canada Internet subscribers accessed the unauthorized streaming services,' the judge in that case wrote. In principal, the 'dynamic' order means that broadcasters can give internet service providers a rolling, minute-by-minute list of sites to block as streamers hop from website to website while the games are happenin
INTERNET PIRACY STREAMING SERVICES COPYRIGHT LEGAL BATTLE SOAP2DAY CANADA
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Appeals Court Pauses Enforcement of Corporate Transparency ActA federal appeals court has halted the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), a law requiring corporations to disclose the identities of their beneficial owners to the U.S. Treasury. The court's decision comes amidst ongoing legal challenges to the CTA, with a Texas federal court previously deeming it unconstitutional. The law is now on hold pending a full ruling by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, expected mid-2025.
Read more »
Elections BC Suspends Review of Election Complaint Amid Court ActionElections BC has temporarily halted its investigation into a complaint filed by a Conservative candidate regarding potential election violations. The suspension comes as a similar claim is being heard in the B.C. Supreme Court. Conservative candidate Bob Randhawa filed a complaint with Elections BC, alleging irregularities in the October election. Days later, he also petitioned the B.C. Supreme Court to overturn the election of New Democrat Garry Begg, citing similar concerns. Elections BC emphasizes that to avoid interfering with the court proceedings, they will postpone their review until a judge reaches a decision. Upon the court's ruling, Elections BC will assess whether to continue their investigation based on the court's findings.
Read more »
Private Clinic Ordered to Pay B.C. Government's Legal Costs in Public Healthcare CaseA private medical clinic in B.C. that unsuccessfully challenged Canada's public healthcare system has been ordered to pay the provincial government's legal costs. Cambie Surgeries Corp. launched its lawsuit in 2009, arguing that B.C.'s Medicare Protection Act unconstitutionally prevented access to private healthcare when the public system was unable to provide timely care. The case went through the B.C. Supreme Court, B.C. Court of Appeal, and the Supreme Court of Canada, with each court rejecting Cambie Surgeries' claim. The latest ruling, by B.C. Supreme Court Justice Jennifer Lynn Whately, focuses on trial costs. The judge determined that Cambie Surgeries, funded by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, had a significant financial interest in the outcome of the case, making them ineligible for public-interest litigant status. The ruling highlights the length and complexity of the litigation, which spanned over a decade and involved legal arguments regarding constitutional obligations to provide public healthcare within a reasonable timeframe.
Read more »
Giuliani Held in Contempt for Defying Court OrderRudy Giuliani was found in contempt of court on Monday for failing to comply with a judge's order to surrender personal items to two former Georgia election workers he defamed. The ruling stems from a defamation trial where Giuliani was ordered to pay $148 million to Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss for spreading false claims about their conduct during the 2020 election. Giuliani has repeatedly defied court orders to hand over records and belongings, leading to the contempt finding.
Read more »
Canada Challenges Court Order to Address Jordan's Principle BacklogThe Canadian government is seeking to overturn a legal order requiring it to immediately address a backlog of requests for assistance at the Jordan's Principle program for First Nations youth.
Read more »
Toronto condo owner fights court order to sell her homeWhile it’s relatively rare for a court to force owners to sell condo properties over extreme or anti-social behaviour, the case highlights the potentially heavy cost of failing to get along with your neighbours
Read more »