This article explores the legal implications of being terminated for time theft, focusing on the case of an employee who was let go after consistently clocking in 15 minutes early. It analyzes the definitions of time theft, just cause for dismissal, and wrongful dismissal, outlining the employee's potential rights and options.
I was recently terminated from my employment at a tech startup because of time theft. I had been punching into work when I arrived early for my shift, up to 15 minutes early. I’ve been at the company for one year and four months. They offered me one week of severance. I believe this is a wrongful dismissal.
What are the rules around time theft? Do you think my situation is enough to claim a wrongful dismissal? Could I also be renegotiating my severance? Time theft refers to actions taken by an employee that result in them being paid for work they did not perform. This can include falsifying time records, taking longer breaks, arriving late, leaving early or engaging in non-work-related activities during paid hours. Company policies usually outline the rules on time theft, including how time will be monitored and the consequences. Courts consider time theft a form of dishonesty that can undermine the core of the employment relationship. Employees who commit time theft can be terminated for “just cause”, meaning they can be fired without notice. Employers must take certain steps before terminating an employee for just cause. For example, in your case, did they investigate? Did they ask for your side of the story? Was there a clear policy on clocking in and out? It’s difficult to say whether you have a claim for wrongful dismissal without more information. Assuming there are no grounds to fire you for cause, you are entitled to notice. The amount of notice is based on statutory and common law. In Alberta, the Employment Standards Code (“ESC”) outlines the minimum notice an employee is entitled to. In your case, under the ESC, your employer is required to provide you with one week of notice or pay in lieu of notice. Depending on the terms of your employment contract, you may be entitled to additional notice/severance based on common law . Finally, if your employer falsely accused you of time theft without properly investigating and this conduct caused you mental distress, you could be entitled to compensation because of the employer’s breach of their duty of good faith and fair dealing in the manner of dismissal. To fully determine if you have a case for wrongful dismissal, it would be best to consult with an employment lawyer so they can review your specific situation. When lawyers say that just cause is the “capital punishment” of employment law, they’re not wrong. Just cause is not only an incredibly high standard, but it’s also all-or-nothing. Meaning, there’s no reduction in the termination pay owed if the conduct is bad, but not bad enough to be cause. But here’s the twist: in Ontario, you’re still entitled to statutory termination and severance pay even if you’re guilty of just cause. This is because the Employment Standards Act, 2000 effectively creates two tiers of misconduct: “Wilful misconduct” is the highest possible standard, described by courts as “being bad on purpose”; andA ruling of wilful misconduct is required to fire someone with no compensation at all, whereas an employee will still be entitled to statutory termination and severance pay if a court finds there was just cause for dismissal. In this case, the employer has assumed that clocking in 15 minutes early was done deliberately to steal pay for work not performed. But were you actually paid for this extra time, or did you receive a flat salary? If you were paid for the time, did you also start working 15 minutes early? If not, did you leave early or cut your lunch short? Was clocking in early a common practice? Did the employer ever comment on it, one way or the other? And most importantly, did you know that what you were doing was wrong (if in fact you did improperly benefit)? In my experience, most terminations for just cause and wilful misconduct are doomed to fail. Because each case turns on its own facts, I strongly recommend you consult an employment lawyer
EMPLOYMENT LAW WRONGFUL DISMISSAL TIME THEFT JUST CAUSE Severance
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Former Canadian Securities Exchange executive seeks millions in wrongful dismissal lawsuit, alleges CEO was ‘abusive’Jamie Anderson alleges CSE chief executive officer Richard Carleton regularly ‘lost his temper’ and engaged in ‘abusive’ behaviour, including yelling at staff, throwing objects and disclosing the personal medical details of staff
Read more »
Former Ventum Financial president files wrongful dismissal lawsuit in B.C. courtIn court filing, Jean-Paul Bachellerie alleges Ventum Financial terminated his employment ‘without cause’
Read more »
December's part-time gains overshadow full-time losses in B.C. labour marketProvince added more than 14K jobs last month, amid notable losses in full-time work
Read more »
Full-time or Part-time PhysiotherapistRadiance Physiotherapy is owned and operated by Megan Doyle, PT, DPT. The vision of the team at Radiance Physiotherapy is to provide individualized care to the community in a warm, modern space with a strong focus on customer service.
Read more »
No Sign of Report on Saint John Police Review of Wrongful Murder ConvictionOver a year after the Saint John, N.B., police chief promised a review of his officers' conduct in the case of two men wrongfully convicted of murder, the report remains elusive. The review, commissioned by Chief Robert Bruce following the exoneration of Robert Mailman and Walter Gillespie, was intended to examine the investigation that led to their long prison sentences. Despite inquiries, there is no timeline for the completion or release of the findings.
Read more »
Saint John Police Review of Wrongful Convictions Remains UnfinishedOver a year after the announcement of a review into the Saint John police's conduct in the wrongful convictions of David Mailman and Derek Gillespie, there are still no concrete answers. Despite the commitment made by Chief Robert Bruce to conduct a comprehensive review, the findings remain elusive. Public figures and advocacy groups are raising concerns about the lack of transparency and the impact on public trust. The case highlights the complexities of police accountability and the need for thorough investigations into potential misconduct.
Read more »