Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules Elections Official Can Remain in Post

Politics News

Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules Elections Official Can Remain in Post
WISCONSINELECTIONSUPREME COURT
  • 📰 BurnabyNOW_News
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 185 sec. here
  • 14 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 108%
  • Publisher: 77%

The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Meagan Wolfe, the state's nonpartisan top elections official, can stay in her position despite not being reappointed by the state Senate. Republican lawmakers had sought to remove Wolfe, blaming her for the 2020 presidential election outcome.

A unanimous Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled Friday that the swing state’s nonpartisan top elections official, who has been targeted for removal by Republican lawmakers over the 2020 presidential election, can remain in her post despite not being reappointed and confirmed by the state Senate. Republicans who control the state Senate tried to fire Wisconsin Elections Commission Administrator Meagan Wolfe in 2023, leading the commission to sue in an effort to keep Wolfe on the job.

The state Supreme Court on Friday upheld a lower court’s ruling in Wolfe’s favor. The 7-0 ruling means that Wolfe can remain in her position and not face a confirmation vote by the Republican-controlled Senate. The court said that no vacancy exists and, because of that, the elections commission “does not have a duty to appoint a new administrator to replace Wolfe simply because her term has ended.” The elections commission and legislative leaders who brought the lawsuit did not immediately respond to emails seeking comment. The court relied on the precedent set in its 2022 ruling that allowed Republican-appointee Fred Prehn to remain on the state Natural Resources Board after his term had ended. That ruling came when the court was controlled by conservatives. The court now has a 4-3 liberal majority. Reliance on the Prehn decision should not be taken as an endorsement of the reasoning in that case, liberal Justice Ann Walsh Bradley wrote in a concurring opinion. She was joined by fellow liberal justices Rebecca Dallet and Jill Karofsky. Because neither side asked for that ruling to be overturned or modified, it was not addressed in the Wolfe decision, the liberal justices said. “Those justices cannot have it both ways,” Chief Justice Annette Ziegler and fellow conservative Justice Rebecca Bradley wrote in response. “If the rule of law is to govern, the resolution of each case should not depend upon the individual occupying the office,” they wrote. Wolfe was targeted for removal by Republican lawmakers who were unhappy with the 2020 presidential election won by former President Joe Biden. Wolfe was the subject of conspiracy theories and targeted by threats from election skeptics who falsely claim she was part of a plot to rig the 2020 vote in favor of Biden. Biden’s win by nearly 21,000 votes in Wisconsin withstood two partial recounts, a nonpartisan audit, a conservative law firm’s review, and multiple state and federal lawsuits. Republicans have not made similar calls for an investigation into the 2024 election won by President Donald Trump. Wolfe was first appointed for the nonpartisan position in 2018 and confirmed to a four-year term by the GOP-controlled state Senate in 2019. The commission is overseen by a bipartisan board that is evenly split between Republicans and Democrats, and Wolfe is head of the nonpartisan staff. When Wolfe was up for reappointment in 2023, all six members of the commission voiced support for her. Three Republicans voted to reappoint, but the three Democrats abstained, resulting in a deadlocked vote. Had Wolfe gotten a fourth vote in support, her appointment would have been sent to the Senate, which then could have voted to fire her. Republicans argued that the law requires the elections commission to appoint a successor when the administrator’s term expires. Wolfe’s term ended 20 months ago. Even though Wolfe’s appointment was not forwarded to the Senate, Republican senators voted in September 2023 to fire Wolfe. The commission sued to challenge that Senate vote. Republican legislative leaders changed course and claimed in court filings that their vote to fire Wolfe was merely “symbolic” and had no legal effect. A Dane County judge ruled that Wolfe is legally serving as administrator of the elections commission as a holdover given that the commission did not have a majority vote to appoint her. Republican leaders of the Legislature appealed, but the state Supreme Court upheld the lower court’s ruling. Republican senators previously voted to reject the confirmation of Wolfe's predecessor, Mike Haas, in 2018 and also fired Democratic Gov. Tony Evers' agriculture department secretary in 2019

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

BurnabyNOW_News /  🏆 14. in CA

WISCONSIN ELECTION SUPREME COURT ADMINISTRATOR REPUBLICANS DEMOCRATS 2020 ELECTION JOE BIDEN DONALD TRUMP

Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

TikTok's fate arrives at U.S. Supreme Court in collision of free speech and national securityTikTok's fate arrives at U.S. Supreme Court in collision of free speech and national securityIn one of the most important cases of the social media age, free speech and national security collide at the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday in arguments over the fate of TikTok, a wildly popular digital platform that roughly half the people in the United States use for entertainment and information.
Read more »

Supreme Court Weighs Free Speech and National Security in TikTok CaseSupreme Court Weighs Free Speech and National Security in TikTok CaseThe Supreme Court will hear arguments on Friday over the fate of TikTok, with the popular social media platform facing a potential shutdown in the U.S. unless the law forcing its sale is overturned. The case pits free speech against national security concerns, as the Biden administration argues China's control of TikTok poses a grave threat, while TikTok and its supporters claim the law violates the First Amendment.
Read more »

Trump Seeks Supreme Court Intervention to Delay SentencingTrump Seeks Supreme Court Intervention to Delay SentencingFormer President Donald Trump is fighting to delay his sentencing in a Manhattan criminal case, turning to the U.S. Supreme Court as his last resort.
Read more »

Trump Seeks Supreme Court Intervention To Halt Sentencing in Hush Money CaseTrump Seeks Supreme Court Intervention To Halt Sentencing in Hush Money CaseFormer President Donald Trump's lawyers have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene and halt his sentencing in a criminal case stemming from hush money payments made to adult film star Stormy Daniels during the 2016 election. Trump was found guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records to conceal the payment. The sentencing is scheduled for 10 days before Trump's inauguration as president, raising the possibility of a delay. Manhattan prosecutors oppose Trump's request, arguing that there is no basis for the Supreme Court to intervene in a pending state criminal trial.
Read more »

Wildfires Rage in Los Angeles, TikTok's Fate at Supreme CourtWildfires Rage in Los Angeles, TikTok's Fate at Supreme CourtThis news bulletin covers several major events: the destructive wildfires sweeping through Los Angeles, the US Supreme Court hearing on TikTok's future, and other news stories from around the world.
Read more »

Supreme Court Ends Legal Saga Between Comedian Mike Ward and Family of Disabled SingerSupreme Court Ends Legal Saga Between Comedian Mike Ward and Family of Disabled SingerCanada's highest court has rejected an appeal by Sylvie Gabriel, bringing to a close a 12-year legal battle involving her son, Jérémy Gabriel, a disabled singer who was mocked by comedian Mike Ward.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-16 03:19:19