Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Upholds Legality of Lame-Duck Session That Limited Governor’s Rule

Canada News News

Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Upholds Legality of Lame-Duck Session That Limited Governor’s Rule
Canada Latest News,Canada Headlines
  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 19 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 11%
  • Publisher: 63%

During the unscheduled extraordinary session, GOP lawmakers took aim at various powers that the governor and attorney general can have while in office, just before two Democrats were to assume the positions from Republican counterparts

The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Friday upheld a lame-duck session that limited the powers of Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and Attorney General Josh Kaul.

During the unscheduled extraordinary session in December, GOP lawmakers took aim at various powers that the governor and attorney general can have while in office, just before Messrs. Evers and Kaul were to assume the positions in January from Republican counterparts. GOP lawmakers said the measures were an effort to balance legislative and executive power.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

WSJ /  🏆 98. in US

Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

U.S. Supreme Court upholds Maryland 'peace cross' in church and state test caseU.S. Supreme Court upholds Maryland 'peace cross' in church and state test caseA 40-foot-tall (12 meters) cross-shaped war memorial standing on public land in ...
Read more »

Supreme Court rules giant cross to veterans on public land is not gov't endorsement of religionSupreme Court rules giant cross to veterans on public land is not gov't endorsement of religionUS Supreme Court says huge concrete cross can stay on public land; rejects claim that its presence is an unconstitutional government endorsement of religion.
Read more »

Supreme Court Rules 40-Foot Cross on Public Land Contains Secular MessageSupreme Court Rules 40-Foot Cross on Public Land Contains Secular MessageThe Supreme Court decided to let a 40-foot cross remain on a Maryland highway median, concluding that the memorial to World War I’s fallen heros holds a secular meaning and does not violate the constitutional separation of church and state.
Read more »

Supreme Court Rules 40-Foot Cross On Public Land Does Not Violate ConstitutionSupreme Court Rules 40-Foot Cross On Public Land Does Not Violate ConstitutionThe challengers argued the huge Christian cross in Maryland defies the First Amendment's ban on establishing religion.
Read more »

Supreme Court rules 'peace cross' in Maryland can remainSupreme Court rules 'peace cross' in Maryland can remainThe Supreme Court said on Thursday that a 40-foot cross on public land in Maryland that was built to honor fallen soldiers in World War I does not violate the separation between church and state and can remain standing.
Read more »

Supreme Court allows cross memorial in Maryland to standSupreme Court allows cross memorial in Maryland to standThe Supreme Court ruled that a cross at a World War I memorial is not a government endorsement of religion and can remain as it is. Pete Williams has details from the court steps.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-03-07 10:54:43