Why Legacy Admissions’ Days Might Be Numbered

Canada News News

Why Legacy Admissions’ Days Might Be Numbered
Canada Latest News,Canada Headlines
  • 📰 Slate
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 42 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 20%
  • Publisher: 51%

“Through the case that was just litigated up to the Supreme Court, we learned quite a bit about Harvard’s admission system that had previously been hidden from view.”

The Senate Probe Into Golf’s Shady Megadeal Has Released Its First Report. Here Are Some of the Juiciest Findings.

Through the case that was just litigated up to the Supreme Court, we learned quite a bit about Harvard’s admissions system that had previously been hidden from view. So we, along with other groups, represented students and alumni of color that were supportive of the affirmative action program at Harvard, and in that litigation, a lot of evidence was uncovered that shed light on all of the ways in which Harvard’s admissions process works.

You’re exactly right that many colleges and institutions at this point have done away with legacy preferences and donor preferences or have never used them in the first place. Particularly over the past eight to 10 years, we have seen significant movement away from those unfair and undeserved preferences. The trend line is clear, and Harvard is on the wrong side of history.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

Slate /  🏆 716. in US

Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

What the Supreme Court’s decision on affirmative action could mean for legacy applicantsWhat the Supreme Court’s decision on affirmative action could mean for legacy applicantsNew challenges take aim at the decades-old practice of giving preference to legacy applicants in college admissions.
Read more »

Local Opinion: Supreme Court Flexes Brawn, not BrainLocal Opinion: Supreme Court Flexes Brawn, not Brain'And ultimately, who gets harmed by having a Court be nothing more than a puppet wing of one political party is all of us.'
Read more »

The commonsense Supreme CourtThe commonsense Supreme CourtJustice Amy Coney Barret uses the term 'common sense' at least six times in her concurrence in the Supreme Court's recent decision in Biden v. Nebraska. And that phrase is a good characterization of the court in its current iteration. Under the leadership of Chief Justice John Roberts, the court…
Read more »

Supreme Court must save West Coast from 9th Circuit’s homeless insanitySupreme Court must save West Coast from 9th Circuit’s homeless insanityThe United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit is not the only reason why cities across the West Coast have been overrun with plague-infected homeless camps, but the court is a big part of the problem.
Read more »

Supreme Court Decision on Reckless Speech Will Cost Victims of Stalking and Harassment - Ms. MagazineSupreme Court Decision on Reckless Speech Will Cost Victims of Stalking and Harassment - Ms. MagazineThe Court’s concern about chilling non-threatening speech will come at a cost—paid by the mostly female victims of stalking and online and verbal harassment who won’t be given the protections they deserve.
Read more »

Congress called to investigate 'broken and captured' Supreme CourtCongress called to investigate 'broken and captured' Supreme CourtA coalition of 90 progressive organizations urged Congress to take action to address allegations of 'corruption' that marred the Court's most recent term.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-03-01 02:21:51