U.S. Supreme Court rules against union in labour dispute involving truck drivers and wet concrete

Canada News News

U.S. Supreme Court rules against union in labour dispute involving truck drivers and wet concrete
Canada Latest News,Canada Headlines
  • 📰 globeandmail
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 48 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 92%

The decision united liberal and conservative justices in labour’s latest loss at the U.S. Supreme Court

In a dispute about the pressure that organized labour can exert during a strike, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday against unionized drivers who walked off the job with their trucks full of wet concrete.

“The Union’s actions not only resulted in the destruction of all the concrete Glacier had prepared that day; they also posed a risk of foreseeable, aggravated, and imminent harm to Glacier’s trucks,” Barrett wrote in a decision joined by four other justices. Three more justices agreed with the outcome in the case but did not join Barrett’s opinion.

In her dissent, Jackson wrote: “Workers are not indentured servants, bound to continue labouring until any planned work stoppage would be as painless as possible for their master.” The company sued the union in state court for intentionally damaging its property; the lawsuit was initially dismissed. Lawyers for the union had said that in this case the drivers were instructed to be conscientious when they walked off the job, to bring their full trucks back to Glacier’s facility and to leave the trucks’ mixing drums spinning so that the concrete would not immediately begin to harden.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

globeandmail /  🏆 5. in CA

Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Charles Manson follower Leslie Van Houten should be paroled, California appeals court rulesCharles Manson follower Leslie Van Houten should be paroled, California appeals court rulesA California appeals court said Tuesday that Leslie Van Houten, who participated in two killings at the direction of cult leader Charles Manson in 1969, should be let out of prison on parole.
Read more »

Judge had no authority to order Syria repatriation, federal appeals court rulesJudge had no authority to order Syria repatriation, federal appeals court rulesIn a blunt 3-0 ruling, Justice David Stratas wrote that the federal judge who said Ottawa is obligated to bring four Canadians home had transformed a right of return into a government duty to rescue people from disastrous choices
Read more »

California appeals court deems Manson follower Van Houten entitled to paroleCalifornia appeals court deems Manson follower Van Houten entitled to paroleCalifornia appeals court rules that Manson ‘family’ member should be eligible for parole
Read more »

One justice explained absence from case. Another didn't. Ethics questions vexing Supreme CourtOne justice explained absence from case. Another didn't. Ethics questions vexing Supreme CourtWASHINGTON (AP) — One Supreme Court justice explained her absence from a case. One justice didn’t.
Read more »

Bruce Pardy: In Canada, courts mandate socialism to fulfil charter rightsBruce Pardy: In Canada, courts mandate socialism to fulfil charter rightsThe Supreme Court has allowed the philosophy of John Rawls to determine meaning of \u0027fundamental justice\u0027
Read more »

Canadian Afghan advisers take government to court over alleged discriminationCanadian Afghan advisers take government to court over alleged discriminationTwo Canadians who served the military in Afghanistan are suing the federal government over alleged discrimination for failing to rescue their family members from the Taliban.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-24 03:46:22