The Supreme Court on Friday upheld a section of federal law used to prosecute people who encourage illegal immigration, ruling against a California man who offered adult adoptions he falsely claime…
The case in front of the court involved Helaman Hansen, who lived in Elk Grove, California, near Sacramento. The federal government says that from 2012 to 2016, Hansen deceived hundreds of non-citizens into believing that he could guarantee them a path to citizenship through adult adoption.
Based on Hansen’s promises, officials say, people either came to or stayed in the United States in violation of the law, even though Hansen knew that the adult adoptions he was arranging would not lead to citizenship. The government says that at least 471 people paid him between $550 and $10,000 each and that in total he collected more than $1.8 million.
Hansen was ultimately convicted of encouragement charges as well as fraud charges. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison for the encouragement charges and another 20 years on the fraud charges. But a federal appeals court ruled that the law on encouragement is overbroad and violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment and overturned just those convictions.
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Affirmative action, student debt among pending 2023 Supreme Court casesThe Supreme Court will announce more decisions in cases it has heard since October this week, which could include whether colleges and universities can consider race in making admission decisions and if Biden’s student-loan forgiveness program is lawful.
Read more »
Native American tribes say Supreme Court challenge was never just about foster kidsNative Americans say the Supreme Court has reaffirmed their power to withstand threats from states in many areas.
Read more »
Why the Supreme Court still hasn't decided on Biden's student loan forgivenessMillions of Americans with student debt are awaiting a Supreme Court ruling on the legality of a Biden administration policy to forgive large amounts of loans.
Read more »
Maryland Supreme Court limits gun ballistics evidence in criminal proceedingsIn a 4-3 opinion, the Maryland Supreme Court ruled to end the long-standing practice of calling in firearms experts during criminal proceedings to testify that a particular gun fired a specific bullet.
Read more »
PolitiFact - Why doesn’t the Supreme Court have a formal code of ethics?Federal laws, some of which were recently tightened, require Supreme Court justices to report gifts valued at more than a few hundred dollars. But there are no official ethics standards for the Supreme Court as there are for lower courts.
Read more »
The enduring damage of the Supreme Court's transgender rulingConservatives have long criticized federal judges, especially on the Supreme Court, who interpret the Constitution in ways that are convenient for liberal ideology by making huge leaps of logic as to the meaning of the law. Many were shockingly displeased when Republican justices did so in 2020.
Read more »