SCOTUS affirmative action ruling: Why experts, activists say it's a step backward

Canada News News

SCOTUS affirmative action ruling: Why experts, activists say it's a step backward
Canada Latest News,Canada Headlines
  • 📰 YahooNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 49 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 59%

The U.S. Supreme Court overturned decades of legal precedent that allowed colleges and universities to consider race during the admission decision process. The 6-3 decision found that race-based admission practices violate the 14th Amendment.

, and the ruling has sparked nationwide concerns around racial equity and diversity in higher education.

Civil rights leaders and advocates say this decision is a step backwards for minorities, and colleges and universities must ensure diversity more now than ever before. Liliana Garces, professor of educational leadership and policy at the University of Texas at Austin, says the impact of the decision will cause a ripple effect. “It's a potential outcome that will have repercussions not just within institutions of higher education, but across all these other sectors of society,” Garces told Yahoo News, ahead of the ruling.Garces and other experts in education and employment policy spoke to Yahoo News ahead of and after the Supreme Court decision.

“My biggest fears are that it will be such an overreach that colleges not only wouldn't be able to ask applicants questions regarding their racialized identity, but that students and counselors and others speaking on their behalf wouldn't be allowed to even disclose or discuss that,” Brigham said.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

YahooNews /  🏆 380. in US

Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Democrats to Supreme Court: Allegations on Thomas, Alito Must Be InvestigatedDemocrats to Supreme Court: Allegations on Thomas, Alito Must Be InvestigatedThe Democrats say that the allegations raise serious questions about the justices’ impartiality and that they warrant a full investigation.
Read more »

Why SCOTUS election law ruling doesn't stop North Carolina congressional map from being changedWhy SCOTUS election law ruling doesn't stop North Carolina congressional map from being changedThe dispute over North Carolina's House map is now moot -- and the U.S. Supreme Court did not rule on whether the lines had to be redrawn
Read more »

How SCOTUS ruling could shift college admissionsHow SCOTUS ruling could shift college admissionsThe Supreme Court is weighing whether to uphold or ban affirmative action nationwide, a move that could permanently alter the way colleges admit students based on race.
Read more »

Supreme Court strikes down affirmative action in college admissionsSupreme Court strikes down affirmative action in college admissionsThe Supreme Court on Thursday outlawed consideration of race as a factor in college admissions, arguing that admissions programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina violate the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.
Read more »

SCOTUS Sides With Democracy in Moore v. HarperSCOTUS Sides With Democracy in Moore v. HarperThe Supreme Court just decided a case at the center of efforts to overturn the 2020 election, and it’s more bad news for Trump.
Read more »

In 'Very Big Deal for the Survival of Our Democracy,' SCOTUS Rejects Fringe Legal TheoryIn 'Very Big Deal for the Survival of Our Democracy,' SCOTUS Rejects Fringe Legal TheoryBy ruling against the independent state legislature theory, said one activist, 'the U.S. Supreme Court made clear that state courts and state constitutions should serve as a critical check against abuses of power by legislators.' MooreVHarper
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-28 07:44:22