Less than 24 hours after the most recent mass shooting in Texas, nine laws loosening restrictions came into effect in the state
-15 rifle fired indiscriminately along a 15-mile stretch spanning Odessa and Midland, two cities in Texas. At least 20 people were injured, seven were killed. Three days later, a 14-year-old in Alabama confessed to killing five family members—his father, stepmother and three siblings—with a handgun. There is no great mystery as to why such incidents regularly happen in America and not any other rich country, yet its lawmakers are reluctant to reduce access to firearms.
Michael Luca, Deepak Malhotra and Christopher Poliquin, three economists, have published a working paper matching mass shootings from 1989 until 2014 with state legislation on gun control. The authors find that in year immediately following a mass shooting, Republican legislatures passed twice as many laws expanding access to guns compared with other years.
Mass shootings seem only to further galvanise people along party lines. A study published this year by David Barney and Brian Schaffner, two political scientists, found that among those who lived within 25 miles of a mass shooting, average support for stricter gun control among Democrats increased by two percentage points. The opposite was true for Republicans.
Less than 24 hours after the most recent mass shooting in Texas, nine new laws came into effect in Texas, all making it easier for civilians to carry guns. They were not motivated by the killings in Odessa and Midland, but rather by prior mass killings. It will now be easier for licensed gun owners to take their weapons into churches and other places of worship. Schools will no longer be able to prevent gun owners from keeping ammunition in their car parks.
President Donald Trump’s administration is preparing new legislation which will expedite the execution of perpetrators found guilty of mass killings, and introduce a number of new gun reforms. The Texan shooter had previously failed a background check, which meant he was unable to buy a gun from a retailer. Yet he was able to obtain a rifle from a private seller, a process which does not require a background check. Mr Trump’s mooted changes are unlikely to close this loophole.
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
After mass shootings, Republicans boost access to guns, and Democrats do very little, a new analysis findsThe findings also reveal a relationship between media coverage of mass shootings and resulting legislative action.
Read more »
Did Walmart just change the gun debate?It's easy to be cynical about the politics of guns in the age of mass shootings. From Columbine to Virginia Tech to Newtown to Parkland to El Paso and Dayton, the immediate outcry for more and better gun laws in the wake of mass shootings gives way to hard political realities -- particularly in the Senate -- that seem to be unchanged by these horrific crimes.
Read more »
Boris Johnson warned he could be jailed if he refuses to delay BrexitBoris Johnson could go to prison if he ignores a bill requiring him to request a Brexit delay
Read more »
How mass shooters exploited legal loopholes, data mistakes, and background checksMost US mass shooters acquired their firearms legally with nothing in their background that would have prohibited them from possessing a gun.
Read more »
How Easy Is It to Get a Gun Versus an Abortion in All 50 States?A state-by-state comparison.
Read more »