WATCH BELOW
As the Canadian national soccer teams head to their respective FIFA World Cups, Derek Van Diest is on the scene to cover all the action. Expect expert insights and analysis in your inbox daily throughout the tournaments, and weekly on Thursdays for the rest of the season.
By clicking on the sign up button you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. You may unsubscribe any time by clicking on the unsubscribe link at the bottom of our emails. Postmedia Network Inc. | 365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4 | 416-383-2300A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.We encountered an issue signing you up.
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
How to fix the Senate's procedure and practiceParliamentary procedure and practice are of course intended to ensure a fair and orderly transaction of Senate business. But well-designed procedural rules and practices can also increase Senators’ effectiveness and efficiency. In this column, I’ll offer a few suggestions for modernizing the Senate’s procedure and practice. The second reading stage of a bill is traditionally the first chance for Senators to discuss the bill. It is the stage where a legislative body decides whether the principle or purpose of the bill merits a thorough clause-by-clause consideration with the possibility of improving it through amendments. That stage makes sense when the House is considering a government or a private member’s bill. The minister or private member sponsoring the bill must convince the Commons that the bill warrants further study instead of immediate rejection. But if the Senate’s mission is to act as a House of legislative revision instead of as a little duplicate of the House, it would never think of rejecting a government bill before sending it to committee for detailed examination and possible amendment. I suggest that it would waste less of the Senate’s time if a government bill received from the House were sent directly to committee for detailed examination without a second reading debate. Senate committees are already celebrated for their thorough study of bills referred to them. Committee study should be the Senate’s first step in examining government bills and not the second step as it is now. The only bills from the House that Senators should want to scrutinize carefully before authorizing a more detailed committee study are private members’ bills. Even after adoption by the House of Commons, private members’ bills may not be supported by the government and thus not be taken into consideration by voters at the next election. Moreover, private members’ bills are not given the same degree of scrutiny by the Commons as government bills are. Why does a government b
Read more »
NLMA Seeking Breakdown of Cost to Run 811 Virtual CareThe Medical Association is looking for a breakdown of the contract awarded to Fonemed to provide 811 virtual c...
Read more »
How to make latte art, according to Canada’s championThe biggest takeaway from the masterclass: a latte artist is only as good as their tools.
Read more »
Toronto water, garbage bills to rise 3%Torontonians should pay an extra 3% in garbage and water fees effective Jan. 1, the city\u0027s executive committee has decided.
Read more »
Indigenous leaders demand Prairie provinces withdraw Ottawa-busting billsIndigenous leaders are demanding Alberta and Saskatchewan withdraw their Ottawa-fighting bills over concerns they may impact treaty rights. One says he doesn't trust the Alberta government.
Read more »
NFL playoff races heat up in Week 14Six divisional games with playoff implications highlight next Sunday’s action in the NFL.
Read more »