+34
New York City leaders are challenging Amazon's reliance on third-party delivery drivers by advancing a bill that would require logistics companies to employ their delivery workers directly. Supporters say the change would strengthen labor protections and limit Amazon's ability to resist unions, while Amazon and driver-service companies warn it could disrupt deliveries and threaten jobs.
Independent journalism is facing unprecedented pressure. As newsrooms shrink, accountability disappears with them. Your membership keeps fearless, reader-funded reporting alive. Mayor Zohran Mamdani and other New York City leaders are challenging the controversial business model that underpins Amazon’s vast delivery network — and the fight’s consequences could stretch far beyond the five boroughs.
, a bill that would force Amazon, FedEx and other logistics companies to hire the drivers who deliver packages to New Yorkers. Though many customers might not realize it, the guy wearing an Amazon uniform and driving an Amazon van is not employed by Amazon — he typically works for one of Amazon’s “The democratic socialist mayor and other backers of the bill say that system has allowed Amazon to skirt the legal responsibilities of employment while still controlling workers.
By making drivers direct employees of Amazon, the law would open the company up to a host of legal liabilities, including wage and safety protections, and strip it of a valuable structural advantage against union organizing. The battle is likely to move to other blue cities and states. In fact, a similar bill has already popped up in Chicago But Amazon is pushing back.
The company warns it might pull its delivery operations out of New York City if the bill passes, leading to fewer jobs and longer delivery times because drivers would have to pick up packages from hubs in Connecticut or New Jersey. DSP owners who would lose their Amazon work have mobilized against the proposal, saying it would destroy their firms.
“They have managed to do home delivery at a scale that now dwarfs even UPS, without having a single delivery person be their employee. ”“But as written, this legislation would directly undermine that commitment — threatening the small businesses that deliver to customers, putting the jobs of more than 5,000 of their employees at risk, and forcing us to consider relocating delivery operations outside of the city,” Nantel said in a statement.
“This would likely mean slower and more expensive delivery. ”Amazon is up against labor unions and progressive worker advocates who view its delivery system as the reflection of a broader scourge that’s been driving down working conditions for decades.
“We cannot hide from the fact that some corporations are so large and influential that their business practices impact entire industries,” Julie Su, New York’s deputy mayor for economic justice, told HuffPost in an interview. “This model has proliferated across the economy… and all of that has contributed to jobs that are more precarious and less secure for working people.
”Zohran Mamdani, mayor of New York, supports the Delivery Protection Act, which could upend the outsourcing model at the heart of Amazon’s delivery network. ”: when a large company focuses on a core competency and hands off as much of the work as possible to smaller firms that compete against one another. Weil argues this decades-long corporate trend has helped companies cut costs but at the expense of workers’ wages and safety.
FedEx pioneered the outsourcing playbook in the transportation sector long ago, but Weil says that Amazon has taken it “to a new, higher level,” in part by using algorithms and AI to steer the work of the people it technically doesn’t employ.
“They have managed to do home delivery at a scale that now dwarfs even UPS, without having a single delivery person be their employee,” Weil told HuffPost. “Proof of the success as a business model is the fact that peopleLuc Albert Rene knows the confusion well. He delivers around 300 Amazon parcels a day. Rene said one of his customers recently chatted with him about his job after he delivered a package wearing his regular blue-and-black Amazon uniform.
“When I told him Amazon doesn’t recognize us as employees, he was just shocked,” said Rene, who earns $24.25 an hour after three years. “We cannot hide from the fact that some corporations are so large and influential that their business practices impact entire industries. ”Rene argues that Amazon ultimately controls the working conditions and that the DSP arrangement is really a construct to avoid legal accountability.
“Amazon keeps claiming we don’t work for them, and yet Amazon dictates our starting time, when we should get back to the station... Amazon has all the control,” he said. Rene has been trying to build support for the Delivery Protection Act with help from the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, one of the legislation’s biggest backers. Organizing Amazon has become imperative for the Teamsters, whose membership has dropped fromtoday. Amazon’s influence as a massive non-union employer affects pay and working conditions across the logistics industry, including at UPS, where more than 300,000 Teamsters work. The Amazon model makes organizing a greater challenge.
The Teamsters have to unionize drivers one DSP at a time, and any gains can be quickly erased if those firms lose their contracts with Amazon. When the union said in 2023 that it had organized a firm of roughly 80 drivers and dispatchers in California, Amazon said it had already decided toSu declined to discuss how the bill could benefit union organizing, saying the proposal is largely about street safety.
A report last year from the city’s Office of the Comptroller found that injury-related crashes increased inOfficials argue that making companies like Amazon legally accountable for delivery quotas would help ensure drivers don’t endanger pedestrians, other drivers or themselves. Beyond the direct-hire mandate, the law would also force last-mile facilities to obtain licenses and meet certain safety and training standards.
Jerome Sloss, who drives for a Queens-based DSP, said he and other drivers sometimes end up in white rental vans with broken locks or no working air conditioning, wheeling packages around on busted hand trucks. He believes the equipment would be better if Amazon were responsible for it.
“All of these problems should point back at Amazon, but because of the way they have the business set up, they constantly tell us to talk to our DSP about it,” he said. “Their favorite excuse is ‘It’s not controlled by us. ’ It’s a lie, of course. Everything is set by Amazon.
” Amazon argues the legislation is built on “misconceptions” around its safety record. The company says serious crashes in its delivery network dropped by 23% last year. Driver-monitoring technologies have made deliveries less dangerous, the company argues, with DSP managers being alerted automatically when the systems detect unsafe behavior. Bashar Yazgi, who owns the Bronx-based DSP Logistics XPress, said he has had only two serious accidents in three years among his roughly 170 drivers.
“Our safety record is impeccable,” Yazgi said. “We pay our own insurance. It’s in our best interest to make sure that we’re promoting a safety-first culture. ” He compares the DSP system to the fast-food business model, which has also drawn fire from worker advocates.
“I don’t see how it’s any different from working for a McDonald’s franchise owner,” Yazgi said. “You represent the brand and you’re wearing a McDonald’s uniform. There’s no difference here. ”Yazgi has been outspoken in his opposition to the Delivery Protection Act.
Under the legislation, his DSP would not exist. He says he has invested more than $1 million in it.the legislation is really about helping the Teamsters grow.
“You don’t have to be in politics” to understand, Cazares said, noting the union has rallied in support of the bill. “But when you have a direct-hire mandate, it’s just a very slick way of eliminating us, the small business owners, to be able to go after Amazon,” he said. “When you have a direct-hire mandate, it’s just a very slick way of eliminating us, the small business owners, to be able to go after Amazon.
”Weil said Amazon’s growth could be “existential” for the high-paying jobs associated with UPS. Although Amazon and UPS have comparable starting pay rates, UPS drivers earn far more as their seniority increases, with the top pay rate hitting $49 next year in New York. Many UPS drivers already crack $100,000 a year with overtime, viewing it as the sort of long-term career not often associated with Amazon delivery.
Amazon says driver pay at DSPs will average“Amazon has created a system that can displace UPS from some of its core markets,” Weil said.
“The whole system that UPS has — that includes union contracts and protections — is under enormous pressure. ” Federal regulators have tried to make Amazon responsible for drivers as a “joint employer” alongside its DSPs, but those efforts were led by Democrats under former President Joe Biden. The Trump administration has moved federal policy in the other direction, giving Amazon more leeway for its outsourcing model and much less to worry about when it comes to unions.
That’s one reason the stakes are so high for the legislation in New York City: It’s an effort by local leaders to break the DSP model in the nation’s most important market. The bill’s substance could change in the coming weeks, but it already hasAsked if she’s worried about Amazon pulling its hubs out of the city, Su said it wouldn’t change the Mamdani administration’s support for the bill.
“Of course we want companies to stay in New York City,” she said. “But we will not sacrifice health and safety as a cost of doing business. ”
Amazon New York City Delivery Drivers Worker Classification Labor Unions
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Netanyahu Expected To Berate New York's Mamdani In 'Campaign Speech' Of UN AddressIsraeli President Benjamin Netanyahu is expected to berate New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani in 'campaign speech' of UN address, according to video statement this week.
Read more »
Netanyahu Arrives in New York for UN Speech as Hamas Backs Gaza Peace RoadmapIsraeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arrived in New York to address the UN General Assembly with no meeting planned with President Donald Trump, while Hamas said it is ready to implement the Board of Peace roadmap and the EU warned that only a fraction of Gaza reconstruction funds have been raised.
Read more »
New York Fed President sees potential for another U.S. rate hike this yearFed officials expect inflation will not be back at target until 2029
Read more »
New York Times Strands Spangram Hint: Is It Vertical or Horizontal?A hint for the latest New York Times Strands puzzle asks whether the spangram, which uses every letter on the board, is arranged vertically or horizontally.
Read more »