A “limited set of materials” taken from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort are potentially covered by attorney-client privilege, Justice Department says in court filing
The Justice Department has identified"a limited set of materials" from its search of documents taken from Mar-a-Lago that potentially contain material covered by attorney-client privilege and is in the process of addressing privilege disputes, it said in a court filing Monday.
Justice officials also confirmed that US intelligence officials are reviewing the documents for classified materials.In a court filing last week, Trump, who is requesting a "special master" to oversee the review of evidence recovered from the search, pointed to some additional legal discussion of case law that he said supported his request. One of those cases had to do with his former attorney Rudy Giuliani.
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
US says it’s reviewed documents seized in Mar-a-Lago searchA legal filing shows the Justice Department has completed its review of potentially privileged documents seized from former President Donald Trump’s Florida estate this month. trump kprc2 click2houston floridanews
Read more »
US: Review of possibly privileged Trump papers already overA legal filing shows the Justice Department has completed its review of potentially privileged documents seized from former President Donald Trump’s Florida estate this month.
Read more »
Judge signals intent to appoint special master in Mar-a-Lago searchJudge Signals Intent to Appoint Special Master in Mar-a-Lago Search
Read more »
US says it’s reviewed documents seized in Mar-a-Lago searchA judge’s order indicated she was inclined to grant the Trump legal team’s request for a special master to review the seized documents.
Read more »
Naming of special master could complicate Mar-a-Lago documents caseIf a federal judge appoints a special master to review materials taken by the FBI from Mar-a-Lago, it could complicate matters in the federal government case.
Read more »