+34
Courts countrywide are grappling with the complex question of whether federal and provincial governments can be sued for the stark overrepresentation of Indigenous children in the off-reserve child welfare system, delivering dizzyingly mixed results.
Estimated 5 minutes The audio version of this article is generated by AI-based technology. Mispronunciations can occur. We are working with our partners to continually review and improve the results.
No one disputes it: the statistics are stark. About eight per cent of the kids in Canada are Indigenous, yet more than half of the children inBut can federal and provincial governments be sued for the overrepresentation of Indigenous kids in the off-reserve child welfare system?
For its part the federal government says no, and British Columbia's top court recently agreed, dismissing a claim against Canada just as lawyers for Indigenous youth in Ontario prepared to appeal a lower court decision they argue "will be a stain on this province’s history" if allowed to stand.
"It's wrong in law, it's wrong on the facts and it's wrong in policy," said David Sterns of Sotos LLP. In that case, brought by plaintiffs named only as B.M. and C.A. , the judge dismissed a lawsuit against Canada and Ontario, saying the overrepresentation of Indigenous kids in the province's system "does not itself convey wrongful state conduct" and instead "may equally demonstrate a high level of care rather than any harmful treatment of the proposed class members.
" "The policies in issue in the present claim, although called the 'Millennial Scoop' by the plaintiffs, do not repeat the oppressions of a past era," wrote Ontario Superior Court Justice Edward Morgan. The ruling got First Nations leaders' attention, prompting the Anishinabek Nation, Chiefs of Ontario and Nishnawbe Aski Nation political organizations to intervene in an appeal heard this week in Toronto.
Grand Council Chief Linda Debassige of Anishinabek Nation speaks at the Canadian Museum of History in Gatineau, Que. , on March 10, 2026. "That reasoning, in my view, is very highly problematic and very dangerous," said Linda Debassige, grand council chief of the Anishinabek Nation, which advocates for 39 communities.
"It's to me in the same light that Indian residential school denialism exists. It's a dangerous pathway to limit the availability of justice for First Nations children and families, specifically, in this setting. The oppression is real. It still exists.
"Millenium ScoopProposed lead plaintiffs B.M. and C.A. are First Nations and Inuit respectively, and their lawyers' appeal filings call the judge's reasoning misguided and patronizing. In its appeal argument, Canada says it "acknowledges the important societal concerns raised" but maintains these are complex policy issues that lay outside judges' expertise.
"The claim is not grounded in any specific law or policy, but rather it seeks to subject to judicial scrutiny the entire provincial child welfare system," Canada argues. A proactively disclosed May 2025 federal briefing note says, "Consistent with its belief that we all have a role to play in reconciliation, Canada has taken the position that some claims against Canada should be dismissed, given the provincial control over child welfare.
" Debassige denounced such talk as "Canada just wiping their hands clean" to create a "jurisdictional pinball vacuum. " The Ontario appeal joins a complex constellation of cases filed after Ottawa agreed to a $23.4-billion settlement with First Nations children and families harmed in the on-reserve child welfare system. That settlement stemmed from a landmark 2016 Canadian Human Rights Tribunal finding that Canada racially discriminated against First Nations youth on-reserve and in Yukon by chronically underfunding child and family services.
Youth living off-reserve when apprehended are not included, however, and their lawyers are getting dizzyingly uneven results. Last year, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed a proposed national class action, the Stonechild case, because Canada was the only defendant and provinces were excluded. Lawyers are seeking leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada. A claim in Quebec was authorized to proceed.
Manitoba consented for a case to proceed. The B.C. Court of Appeal late last month dismissed a claim against Canada but allowed a lawsuit against B.C. to proceed. Factor in the Ontario case, and the jumble of inconsistent outcomes means Canada's top court may have to weigh in, said Sterns.
"They have a lot to answer for when it comes to Indigenous child welfare, both on and off reserve, and we think this is an issue that is ripe to be decided by the Supreme Court of Canada. " As for Ontario, the province said on appeal it recognizes the deeply felt impacts experienced by Indigenous children and families but still opposes the lawsuit.
"This proposed class action is a sweeping inquiry into the child welfare, health care and education sectors in Ontario," the filing says. Ontario calls the claims "imprecise," comprising many thousands of unique interactions with independently suable Children's Aid Societies. Brett Forester is a senior reporter with CBC Indigenous in Ottawa. He is a member of the Chippewas of Kettle and Stony Point First Nation in southern Ontario who previously worked as a journalist with the Aboriginal Peoples Television Network.
Please follow us on Google to support usCanada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Cleveland-Cliffs Job Cuts Could Trigger Legal Action Over Acquisition CommitmentsA legal expert says Cleveland-Cliffs' plan to cut up to 500 workers at Stelco's Hamilton and Lake Erie facilities may violate job guarantees made when the company acquired the steelmaker in 2024. The full terms of the commitments remain confidential, and Ottawa could seek an order requiring compliance, impose penalties or pursue a sale if the company fails to meet them.
Read more »
Union says Stelco layoff rationale disingenuous as Carney vows legal action over job cutsThe United Steelworkers says Stelco's U.S. parent company is being disingenuous by blaming the trade war for planned layoffs of up to 500 workers while Prime Minister Mark Carney says he is very disappointed and intends to use all powers to the fullest extent of the law.
Read more »
California Bans Child Marriage, A Practice That’s Still Legal In 32 StatesA bill signed Wednesday closes legal loopholes that permitted the practice to anyone under the age of 18, ending a near 10-year fight.
Read more »
49th Kennedy Center Honors Moved to Capital One Arena Due to Legal DisputesThe 49th annual Kennedy Center Honors will be held at Washington's Capital One Arena instead of the iconic riverfront venue on December 7. The relocation follows a legal battle over plans to add Trump's name to the building, which a federal judge has blocked without Congressional approval, citing the center's status as a memorial to John F. Kennedy. The change in venue has not been officially explained, and the honorees for the upcoming ceremony have yet to be announced.
Read more »