Here’s what Ottawa is getting wrong on pensions GlobeInvestor
The enhancement to the Canada Pension Plan started off as a positive development but has been marred by poor implementation within public-sector pension plans.Frederick Vettese is former chief actuary of a national consulting firm and also the author ofWith the federal election looming, it is a good time to assess the government’s stewardship of the country’s retirement income system.
In a nutshell, today’s seniors are doing relatively well but that won’t be the case in 25 years, even with the recent expansion of the Canada/Quebec Pension Plan. Too many pension dollars are going to civil servants and not enough for other taxpayers. Here is a short list of what the federal government is doing wrong.Fewer than 10 per cent of private-sector workers are still covered by defined-benefit plans and since more than half of those plans are closed to new members, that number will eventually shrink to 5 per cent or less. DB plans are simply too risky. Even public-sector plans are softening their DB pension promises somewhat. The one glaring exception is the federal public-service pension plan , which is sustainable for only one reason: Its pension promises are backstopped by all taxpayers, not just the half-million or so PSSP members. The cost of this hidden guarantee is massive . The federal government should at least fall in line and move to defined-contribution pension plans for its own employees.The federal government helps Canadians prepare for retirement by allowing tax-deductible contributions to be made to pension plans and RRSPs. Not all Canadians are created equal though when it comes to tax assistance in saving. Employer and employee contributions for some public-sector workers total 30 per cent of pay. The 90 per cent or so of Canadians in the private sector who are not covered by a DB plan can salt away only 18 per cent of their earnings. To level the playing field, the government should either: restrict total contributions within public-sector DB plans to 18 per cent of pay, and/or allow all taxpayers to make greater tax-deductible contributions in their RRSPs.Half a century ago, there were more than six working-age Canadians for every retiree. Now, there are just four and a generation from now it will almost certainly shrink to two. This makes an economic crisis almost inevitable. The government should be encouraging people to work longer, but it is doing the exact opposite with its own employees. Most civil servants continue to be able to retire by the age of 60 with a heavily subsidized pension. This perverse incentive is costing taxpayers billions a year. Of course, people should be able to retire whenever they want; they just shouldn’t expect assistance from other taxpayers to retire early.The previous Harper government enacted legislation to eventually raise the retirement age for old-age pensions from 65 to 67. One of the first actions of the Trudeau government was to reverse that legislation. While that action was popular with older voters, it runs contrary to what the rest of the developed world is doing. Almost everywhere, normal retirement within government programs is now 67 to 70 for the reasons mentioned in the previous point. The other problem with OAS is that the government is allowing it to shrink gradually in real terms. Today, the OAS pension equates to 13.5 per cent of the average national wage. In two generations, that will fall to 7 per cent unless the federal government takes action. This is happening because the maximum pension is indexed to the CPI, whereas it should be indexed to the national average wage, which tends to rise faster than CPI.The enhancement to the Canada Pension Plan started off as a positive development. When it is fully phased in, CPP pensions will be up to 50 per cent larger. Unfortunately, the enhancement has been marred by poor implementation within public-sector pension plans. Previously, those plans had been integrated with the CPP, meaning pension promises were offset for the CPP pension so the overall pension was at an appropriate level. Instead of increasing the offset to recognize a bigger CPP, many public-sector plans are doing precisely the opposite: they are de-integrating, meaning they are stacking CPP on top of the pension benefit their plan pays. When it enhanced the CPP, the federal government could have forced all pension plans to integrate with the larger CPP benefit. Some of these problems result in billions of tax dollars being spent unnecessarily, some perpetuate a situation of blatant unfairness and some run contrary to the country’s long-term economic health. The question is whether ordinary taxpayers will ever speak up in large enough numbers to demand corrective measures.
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Evening Update: Trudeau pledges millions to fight Amazon fires as G7 summit ends; China vows harsh consequences for companies siding with Hong Kong protestersAlso: Ontario, Ottawa announce $54-million to fight guns and gangs
Read more »
Calgary to build tiny home village for homeless veteransOttawa provides $3 million annually to organizations from a fund for veterans and their families to pay for housing, employment and mental-health initiatives
Read more »
Ontario and Ottawa may revive French-language universityA spokesman for the Francophone Affairs Minister says the province and the federal government are currently discussing a potential funding agreement to build the school
Read more »
HuffPost is now a part of Oath
Read more »
Brannstrom, Brown highlight Senators' 2019 rookie camp roster - Sportsnet.caThe Ottawa Senators have announced the 28-man roster that will participate in the club's annual rookie camp.
Read more »