+34
A federal judge in Texas temporarily blocked the Trump administration from building a border wall and other infrastructure across the Big Bend region, handing a victory to landowners, businesses and environmentalists who oppose the US$46 billion project.
WASHINGTON - A federal court in Texas on Friday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from building a border wall and other infrastructure across the state's Big Bend region, handing a victory to opponents of a key campaign promise by U.S. President Donald Trump.
Big Bend Infrastructure Projects Halted by Court
The ruling by Judge Kathleen Cardone covers Big Bend National Park and areas upriver and downriver from it, where U.S. Customs and Border Protection has planned a range of border infrastructure projects. The projects are part of a US$46 billion effort by the Trump administration to line the southern border with a mix of 30-foot-tall steel walls, vehicle barriers, roads and surveillance technology. Landowners, businesses and environmentalists in the region have united to oppose the planned projects.
They argue that the 500-mile-long Big Bend region of Texas is so remote and the landscape so rugged that it serves as its own deterrent to illegal immigration. They also argue that the administration violated the law when it issued a swath of waivers allowing it to bypass numerous regulations in order to speed up border wall infrastructure projects.
Cardone said in her ruling that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of at least one of the claims in suit, that there is a likelihood that they will suffer serious, irreparable harm without an injunction, and that the balance of the equities and the public interest weigh in their favor. U.S. Customs and Border Protection defended the project in a statement Friday.
Trump Administration Weighs Next Legal Steps
We stand by our assessment and remain confident in our legal authorities to secure the border while preserving the unique landscape of the Big Bend region, the agency said. We are working with the Department of Justice on next steps. The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The lawsuit was brought by an environmental organization, advocates for a historic church in Ruidosa and a river guide.
It argued that the Department of Homeland Security was wrong to circumvent regulations meant to protect the environment, culture and archaeology of regions like the Big Bend area. Laiken Jordahl, with the Center of Biological Diversity that brought the suit, called Cardone's ruling a total victory. The bulldozers are going to be sent packing until she rules on the merits, Jordahl said. This is such a historic day for Big Bend and for Texas and the Constitution.
The court's decision comes just weeks after the administration erected the first border wall panels in the Big Bend sector in mid-September. The border wall project throughout the Big Bend sector has sparked bipartisan opposition. Much of the opposition has been geared around CBP's plans for inside the Big Bend National Park, which is prized for its beautiful landscapes, limestone cliffs and crystal clear night sky views.
Opposition Grows Against Big Bend Wall
When bulldozers were spotted clearing land in the park in August, it sparked widespread opposition, with both Republicans and Democrats calling for the administration to stop. CBP paused all activity there, but that pause expired earlier this week. The administration has said it is reevaluating plans for the National Park but has not yet said what it will do there.
Advocates for the park on Friday said they were happy with the judge's ruling but called on the administration to fix the damage already done to Big Bend National Park and develop alternative plans. Big Bend is no place for border barriers, Tiernan Sittenfeld, National Parks Conservation Association President and CEO, said in a statement.
It is time for the administration to come to the table with the border communities that know Big Bend best, repair the damage from this ill-conceived project, and find new solutions. In the areas outside the national park covered by the ruling, CBP has planned infrastructure projects that would largely require building across privately owned land. The government has been working to obtain permission from local landowners to survey and build on their land.
In a recent court filing, the government said it was prepared to refer some cases to the Justice Department in which it had been unable to secure permission from landowners. Rebecca Santana, The Associated Press
CTVNews
CP24:This story was compiled and edited by the HeadTopics newsroom and HT AI from the reports above.
Border Wall Big Bend National Park Trump Administration Federal Court Environmental Regulations Big Bend Border Wall Trump Administration Border Wall Judge Kathleen Cardone Ruling Center Of Biological Diversity Lawsuit
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Judge Rules Roger Rogoff Remains US Attorney After Trump FiringA federal judge ruled that Roger Rogoff is the rightful US attorney for the Western District of Washington, overturning the Trump administration's attempt to remove him after judges appointed him in July.
Read more »
As Texas declares state of emergency over fuel shortage, what’s dyed dieselAs global oil supplies continue to tighten up amid ongoing geopolitical conflicts that have pushed up fuel prices, the governor of Texas has declared a state of emergency.
Read more »
U.S. judge overturns Trump’s decision to fire court-appointed attorney in SeattleA judge on Thursday overturned U.S. President Donald Trump’s decision to fire the court-appointed top U.S. prosecutor in Seattle, the latest development in a legal tug-of-war over the administration’s efforts to control who occupies the powerful Justice Department posts.
Read more »