From WSJopinion: The Democrats’ “ethics” bill would turn nearly every case the Court hears into a political football and ultimately destroy public confidence in the judiciary
Journal Editorial Report: The Department of Justice accelerates its legal offensive. Images: Zuma Press/AFP/Getty Images Composite: Mark Kelly
Democrats are continuing their campaign to discredit the Supreme Court, and their frequent demand these days is “recuse!” They want conservative Justices disqualified from hearing cases that they fear won’t turn out the way progressives want. This needs to be understood as an attempt to usurp the judiciary and control the Court.Continue reading your article with
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Maldives Supreme Court bars jailed ex-President Yameen from raceThe Maldives Supreme Court confirmed on Sunday that jailed former President Abdulla Yameen Abdul Gayoom is barred for the country's September presidential election.
Read more »
Supreme Court Justice Sonia SotomayorON THIS DAY: In 2009, Sonia Sotomayor was confirmed as the first Hispanic Supreme Court justice by a Senate vote of 68-31.
Read more »
How medical schools are considering race after the Supreme Court limited affirmative action in admissionsDaily News | How medical schools are considering race after the Supreme Court limited affirmative action in admissions
Read more »
The new liberal majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court is off to a tense startWhen liberal judge Janet Protasiewicz won a seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court this year, it put an end to the bitterest state Supreme Court races in U.S. history. But when she was sworn in last week, tensions on the bench erupted into public view.
Read more »
Supreme Court opens door to real education reformThe Supreme Court decision ending affirmative action throws open the door to real reform. But if conservatives want to be part of it, they need to take a seat at the table.
Read more »
Former Colorado Supreme Court Chief Justice Censured for Role in Contract DebacleFormer Chief Justice Nathan B. Coats has received an unprecedented public censure for violating the state's judicial code of conduct by allowing a $2.75 million contract with a former top courts administrator. The censure carries no penalty and is largely ceremonial.
Read more »