The Supreme Court says home builders in California may challenge the fees commonly imposed by cities and counties to pay for new infrastructure.
The Supreme Court ruled Friday that developers and home builders in California may challenge the fees commonly imposed by cities and counties to pay for new roads, schools, sewers and other public improvements. The justices said these 'impact fees' may be unconstitutional if builders and developers are forced to pay an unfair share of the cost of public projects.
“We are thrilled that the court agreed and put a stop to a blatant attempt to skirt the 5th Amendment’s prohibition against taking private property without just compensation.” The case will now go back to the California courts. Beard said the 'fee must be set aside as an unconstitutional taking, because the county has failed to show — and cannot show — that the fee is sufficiently related and proportionate to the traffic impacts of Mr. Sheetz’s modest home.
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court Case Divides California Governor and ProgressivesAn upcoming Supreme Court case has divided Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom and progressives. The case from Oregon centers on whether homeless people have the right to sleep outside. Grants Pass—the small city of roughly 40,000 people—was sued by the homeless who argued that the city unlawfully punished them for sleeping on the streets when no other shelter is available and unlawfully banned the use of sleeping bags, blankets, pillows and even cardboard boxes in public spaces.
Read more »
California Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence for Polly Klaas' MurdererThe California Supreme Court upholds Richard Allen Davis' death sentence for the 1993 kidnap and murder of 12-year-old Polly Klaas, rejecting all of Davis' legal arguments and his bid to overturn his convictions.
Read more »
California Supreme Court hears arguments on UC Berkeley’s plans for housing at People’s ParkThe court will determine whether noise from future residents should be considered “pollution” under CEQA as the University moves forward with its long-range plan.
Read more »
What the Supreme Court’s abortion pill case could mean for CaliforniaThe high court is weighing a case that could rewrite the rules of care in more than two-thirds of U.S. abortions, limiting access to a popular drug even in states where it remains legal.
Read more »
Will California restock its emergency reserve of abortion pills after today’s Supreme Court hearing?California bought and distributed a quarter of a million abortion pills, fearing a ban. The Supreme Court now seems hesitant to limit them.
Read more »
Appeals court blocks Texas immigration law after Supreme Court actionLawrence Hurley covers the Supreme Court for NBC News.
Read more »