Anthropic investor Lonsdale says AI firms stoking fear to sway policy

Joe Lonsdale News

Anthropic investor Lonsdale says AI firms stoking fear to sway policy
Anthropic, Existential Risks From AI, Leading Companies

By Joe Brock AUSTIN, Sept 25 (Reuters) - Joe Lonsdale, an investor in Anthropic and the co-founder of technology company Palantir, said on Friday that efforts by some leading artificial intelligence

Anthropic investor Lonsdale says AI firms stoking fear to sway policy Co-founder of Palantir Technologies Joe Lonsdale attends an interview with Reuters at the Momentum AI Austin 2026, in Austin, Texas, U.S., September 25, 2026.

REUTERS/Kaylee GreenleeAUSTIN, Sept 25 - Joe Lonsdale, an investor in Anthropic and the co-founder of technology company Palantir, said on Friday that efforts by some leading artificial intelligence companies to warn of existential risks from AI amounted to a dangerous attempt to ‌shape public policy. Lonsdale, also founder of venture capital firm 8VC, criticized what he described as efforts by people close to Anthropic and ‌at OpenAI to fund outside groups advocating stronger AI regulation, which he argued could help a small number of leading companies shape the rules governing the industry and entrench their market ​power.

"I think that what OpenAI and Anthropic are pushing right now is very dangerous, and we don't want an oligopoly that controls all of our policy here with the government," Lonsdale said at the Reuters Momentum AI Austin event. "Safety is a real thing, but fear and regulation — we've got to be really careful how we respond to those things.

" Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Elon Musk, who heads SpaceX, have all this month called for leading ‌AI companies to slow the pace of development of ⁠their most advanced models, warning that increasingly powerful systems could pose existential risks to humanity if safeguards fail to keep pace. Lonsdale, 44, tempered his criticism with praise for Amodei and Anthropic, in which he is a small investor, ⁠saying the company had assembled exceptional talent and emerged as a leader in the AI race.

"It's very hard for anyone to second-guess the highest-performing company in the world over the last few years," Lonsdale said. "I'm proud to be an investor in Anthropic. "Lonsdale, who has backed defense technology firms including Anduril, said some of ​these ​companies will likely buy some Ukrainian defense companies.

Ukrainian drone and defense technology firms had ​made rapid advances by continuously adapting battlefield systems during Russia's ‌more than four year war, he said, adding that he sees opportunities for deeper partnerships and potential acquisitions.

"We're partnering very closely with them. A lot of our companies work with their companies," Lonsdale said.

"A lot of our companies are likely to buy some of the companies over there. "Lonsdale said that while AI-powered autonomous weapons are the future of warfare, accountability must remain with military leaders. The issue has taken on greater urgency in Ukraine, where drones and increasingly automated systems are central to combat.

It was also highlighted in the US-Iran war early this year, when a strike on a ‌girls' school in Minab, Iran, killed more than 175 children and teachers, according to ​Iranian officials. Reuters reported that a preliminary US military investigation found US forces were ​likely responsible, and pointed to outdated intelligence used in the targeting ​process.

"There's always a person responsible who is in charge of whatever system they studied, worked on and approved," Lonsdale said. "It's ‌very easy from the outside to judge these things when ​you're not there in the fog ​of war. "Lonsdale has been mentioned in recent months as a potential candidate for a senior Pentagon leadership role. Asked whether he would serve if asked, he said his priority was his family and businesses.

"Obviously, if a President calls you and asks something of you, you ​should consider it. But my focus right now ‌is on building my businesses and my community.

" The Pentagon has faced significant leadership turmoil recently, with several high-profile departures among its senior ​ranks. Reuters reported this month that the White House had reviewed potential replacements for Deputy Defense Secretary Steve Feinberg.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

YahooFinanceCA /  🏆 47. in CA

Anthropic Existential Risks From AI Leading Companies Defense Companies

 

Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines

Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Anthropic Researcher Quits Over AI Existential Risk ConcernsAnthropic Researcher Quits Over AI Existential Risk ConcernsAI researcher Jacob Coxon resigned from Anthropic, citing serious concerns that superintelligence could wipe out humanity by the end of the decade, sparking debate on the pace of AI development.
Read more »

Anthropic expands Canadian footprint with AI training programAnthropic expands Canadian footprint with AI training programThe partnership with Venture for Canada gives entrepreneurs access to a Claude Max licence for the six-week program to help them turn their ideas into a viable business
Read more »

Appeals Court Upholds Pentagon Supply Chain Risk Label on AnthropicAppeals Court Upholds Pentagon Supply Chain Risk Label on AnthropicA federal appeals court ruled 2-1 that the Pentagon can keep Anthropic designated as a supply chain risk, allowing the removal of Claude models from Defense Department systems. Anthropic says it disagrees and may seek further review.
Read more »

Court Rejects Anthropic's Challenge to Pentagon's Supply-Chain Risk DesignationCourt Rejects Anthropic's Challenge to Pentagon's Supply-Chain Risk DesignationA federal appeals court has upheld the Pentagon's designation of Anthropic as a supply-chain risk, allowing the Defense Department to bar its Claude models from government systems, despite the company's claims that such actions infringe on free speech and national security principles.
Read more »