+34
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's constitutional reform proposals face silence from other premiers ahead of an October 19 referendum, with experts questioning whether the changes can win federal and provincial support.
EDMONTON - Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's counterparts across Canada are keeping their cards close to their chest on where they stand on the major constitutional reform s Smith is sending to a provincewide vote next month, with many declining to respond to repeated requests for their positions.
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith Puts Four Proposals to Vote
Smith's four proposals, three of which would likely require the support of seven legislatures representing over half of Canada's population, known as the 7/50 rule, and Parliament to implement, are among 10 questions she is putting to Albertans on Oct. 19. Her ideas are: to abolish the Senate; let Alberta, not Ottawa, pick provincial King's Bench and Court of Appeal judges; allow Alberta to opt out of federal programs without losing the associated funding; and to give provincial laws standing over Ottawa's when jurisdictional disputes occur.
Smith's government concedes on its referendum website that abolishing the Senate, which would require unanimous cross-country support and the support of the Senate itself, is going to be a non-starter for other political leaders. But the premier's office says there is support for the other proposals and that targeted amendments to Canada's legal and administrative spine are more likely to become reality, which is why it wants a mandate from Albertans to proceed.
Provinces across the country are tired of federal overreach and want more authority within Confederation, not less, said Ryan Fournier, a communications adviser to Smith. We believe this conversation is a vital step towards a fairer Confederation, he said. The Canadian Press reached out to premiers across the country to ask whether they supported Smith's proposals, but many did not respond to repeated requests.
Canadian Leaders Decline to Comment on Referendum
Some, such as Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe's office, said they would not be commenting, and those who did respond did not answer directly. This is a matter for Albertans to consider through their referendum process, said a spokesperson for Northwest Territories Premier R.J. Simpson. Nunavut Premier John Main said the territory is closely monitoring the results of the referendum.
Like Alberta, Nunavut is rich in resources that benefit the rest of Canada and the world, and we need external supports to bring those resources to market, Main said. We intend to make our mark in partnership with other governments and private industry, and support measures that build a stronger Canada. Yukon Premier Currie Dixon said he looked forward to hearing what Albertans have to say when it comes to the Constitution, but did not offer an opinion.
He did, however, voice his support for Alberta remaining in Canada, referring to the headlining question on succession. While I know Albertans have a number of grievances with the federal government, it is my hope that Alberta will continue to stay in Confederation, Dixon said. Canada, including the Yukon, would be negatively affected if Alberta were to leave.
Expert Sees Potential for Provincial Judicial Changes
While they may not be saying so now, one constitutional law expert said Smith's office is correct in saying there could be enough support from other provincial governments to take two of the proposals beyond the ballot: having provinces pick provincial judges and opting out of federal programs without financial punishment. It is extra provincial power. Why would they not want it? said Gerard Kennedy, a constitutional law professor at the University of Alberta.
To me, the big problem is going to be getting the federal Parliament to agree, because the federal government would have to be agreeing to reduce its own power for nothing in return. Smith, Moe, Ontario Premier Doug Ford and former Quebec premier François Legault penned a letter to Ottawa in March asking that all provincial Appeal Court and Superior Court judges be appointed from a pre-approved list submitted by the provinces.
Federal Justice Minister Sean Fraser quickly shut the issue down, saying Ottawa was not considering changes to the judicial appointment process. He pointed to the advisory committees set up across the country that review and advise on judicial applications to say that provinces already have input, since each government appoints some of the committee's members.
Kennedy said the proposal about giving provincial laws paramountcy over federal laws probably will not go anywhere, adding that there was no federation in the world with that setup. He said regardless of the support that may exist, Alberta could be opening a can of worms if it makes serious efforts at working with other provinces.
The problem if you open up constitutional negotiations is that some other provinces are going to have their pet projects and they will say, well, we will not agree to amend the Constitution on terms favorable to Alberta unless they are also amended on terms that are favorable to New Brunswick or Quebec, he said. And then you end up having a package and too many provinces will not like some part of the package and then it does not get through, Kennedy added.
Alternative Constitutional Amendment Route Suggested
He said there is a third way Alberta could try to amend the Constitution. Some changes can be made with only the support of Parliament and the province that is being affected by the amendment. An example was in 2001, when the Constitution was amended to change the name of Newfoundland to Newfoundland and Labrador.
Alberta could try to go that route, Kennedy said, but the effort would likely end up in court, as granting the province special privileges others do not have would go against the presumption that all provinces are treated equally. Despite the premier and her office hinting that they are committed to lobbying other provinces should the four proposals get majority approval on Oct. 19, some doubt Smith can secure the necessary support to implement the changes.
CTVNewsVI
CP24:This story was compiled and edited by the HeadTopics newsroom and HT AI from the reports above.
Danielle Smith Alberta Referendum Constitutional Reform Canadian Premiers Senate Abolition Judicial Appointments Federal Overreach Alberta Constitutional Referendum 7/50 Rule Provincial Premiers
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Snapchat Location Sharing Warning After Alberta Child Exploitation ArrestAlberta ICE warns families about location sharing after an 18-year-old man allegedly used Snapchat to track and victimize two youth, leading to multiple charges.
Read more »
Alberta cycling advocates take bike lane fight to the legislatureCycling advocates from Calgary and Edmonton are delivering thousands of handwritten postcards to the Alberta legislature on Friday as part of a campaign urging the province to drop planned legislation that could restrict new bike lanes and allow existing ones to be torn out.
Read more »
Alberta Premier Smith's Constitutional Reform Proposals Face Uncertain Support From Other PremiersAlberta Premier Danielle Smith is sending four major constitutional reform proposals to a provincewide vote on October 19, but other premiers are keeping their cards close on whether they support them. Experts say two proposals could gain provincial backing, but federal and cross-country hurdles remain.
Read more »