AI ethics warns us of bad blood and feuds that can arise from an us-versus-them human mindset, illustrated via the possible wrong way of adopting AI-based self-driving cars.
I am about to introduce you to an us-versus-them that I am guessing you haven’t put much thought toward. I say this because we customarily think of the us-versus-them in human terms. Humans of one group are anConsider the circumstance of us-versus-them in terms of humans versus Artificial Intelligence .
The most usual variant is that we will perceive our fellow humans as being in an in-group or an out-group as shaped around the use of AI. There might be some people that are actively using AI. We could label them as the in-group. Other people that aren’t using AI are by default members of the out-group.
I do though want to keep that humans versus humans divisional grouping due to AI usage as something that we’ll be getting to further in a moment. Please keep it in the back of your mind. Lots of movies and coverage of this kind of situation took place during the Cold War era. With today’s non-sentient AI nowadays involved as slick algorithmic decision making automation, we are stepping up the chances of cataclysms happening. You don’t need sentience per se to get the cascading effects of planetary-wide destruction. Automation such as via everyday AI can be a catalyst but doesn’t have to be “thinking” to enable the possibility of such an apocalypse.
Of course, any attempt at a detailed “conversation” with the likes of Alexa or Siri of today will pretty quickly get you into the zone of irksome irritation. That AI is relatively brittle and narrow. You cannot carry on a truly fluent discussion. As a result, you find yourself resorting to curt commands and drop the whole harrowing effort of trying to talk with your computing buddy, as it were.
Some people will falsely ascribe human sentience capacities to AI. Once you’ve made that initial leap, the rest of the jump is kind of effortless. You might begin to hate AI for what it is doing or what it is not doing. For example, you make use of an AI-based online mortgage granting app. After entering some data about yourself, the AI system tells you that you have been turned down for your desired home loan. What do you do? You get angry at the AI.
Canada Latest News, Canada Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Elon Musk On Tesla's AI Leadership & Idea To Make Traffic Lights SmarterElon Musk shared some good tweets about Tesla's AI and even a cool idea that would bring innovation to traffic lights.
Read more »
'Brain Implants' Will Make Learning Obsolete in 20 Years, AI Expert SaysAccording to Nikolas Kairinos, a leading artificial intelligence expert, in the next 20 years, we will likely have implants put into our heads that will allow us to learn everything. Find out more at 🚀 Engineering
Read more »
How Wrongful Arrests Based on AI Derailed 3 Men's LivesWIRED spoke with three men misidentified by facial recognition software about how their wrongful arrests changed their lives and the lives of people around them.
Read more »
AI discovery could advance the treatment of spinal cord injuries | EngadgetScientists have used a combination of AI and robotics to develop an enzyme that could treat spinal cord injuries and help people walk again..
Read more »
Is AI the key to the Metaverse? | HackerNoonIn this slogging thread, we discuss whether the key to the Metaverse is AI. According to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, it is. However, the Hackernoon staff disagree
Read more »
Tesla and the ethics of self-driving carsSelf-driving technology has come a long way in recent years, but it remains far from perfect. And that's partially because of decisions made -- not by the cars -- but by programmers. Who should regulate self-driving cars?
Read more »